February 21, 2020Categories:
TL;DR: Configuring Cloud Build to automatically handle Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment for this site based on Git triggers ended up being a bit trickier than I would have expected.
Table of Contents:
- Picking a CI/CD Tool
- Attempting to Use the Cloud Build GitHub App
- GCP Set Up
- Creating the Cloud Build Pipeline (cloudbuild.yaml)
- Closing Thoughts
This is a continuation of the previous post (The Making of This Site (Hugo, Caddy, + GCP)) in which I walked through the set up of this site. In this post I add automated builds/deploys to the site.
All of the commands for creating the site, as well as setting up this automation can be found in this GitHub Repo.
Picking a CI/CD Tool
Initially, I was going to use Circle CI to automate the process of building and deploying the site. Circle CI has direct integration with Github and posted to their blog in 2018 explaining how to Automate Your Static Site Deployment with CircleCI using Hugo as the example site generator.
That being said, since everything in the site setup was GCP based, I decided to try out Cloud Build. Cloud Build also has a GitHub app and being within the same GCP project meant I wouldn’t have to deal with shuffling additional service account credentials between platforms.
Also, just like with the server set up, Cloud Build is also included in GCP free tier (up to 120 build minutes/day) so this shouldn’t cost me anything.
Attempting to Use the Cloud Build GitHub App
Thinking this would be a 30 minute task, I eagerly installed the Cloud Build Github app and added a build trigger based on pushes to the master branch. When the build succeeded I was not greeted with the website, but instead with the Default Caddy home page. After manually navigating to the
/articles endpoint I saw the following:
The content files were there, but I realized that It wasn’t being rendered properly because the build failed to get the theme files. After doing more research I concluded that it has to do with the fact that the theme is not stored within the website Git repo, but is a Git submodule.
In an attempt to solve this, I adding a step to the build pipeline to grab the submodule files using:
git submodule init git submodule update
but Cloud Builds triggered from GitHub don’t have access to the
.git directory within the repo and these commands will fail. The best workaround I could find was to mirror the GitHub repo into a Cloud Source Repository. This is already getting more complicated than I had hoped, but the show must go on!
GCP Set Up
At this point I had arrived what I thought was a viable plan that I just needed to execute on.
NOTE: The commands that follow use $PROJECT_ID and other template variables that should reflect the relevant project and values.
To accompany this article, I also created a full video walkthrough of setting up the pipeline. Feel free to follow along or skip it depending if you prefer the video or written format!
1) Mirroring GitHub Repo to Cloud Source
As noted above, I needed to mirror the GitHub repo for my website into a Cloud Source repo. I couldn’t find a good way to script this, so I just followed the guidance in this Google post: Mirroring a GitHub repository
2) Enable the Cloud Build API
In order to use Cloud Build I had to enable the cloud build api using:
gcloud services enable cloudbuild.googleapis.com --project=$PROJECT_ID
3) Add IAM Roles for Cloud Build Service Account
When the Cloud Build API is enabled, a service account of the format
[email protected] is granted some IAM roles, but for this build pipeline the service account also needs the following two roles:
Compute Instance Admin (v1) Service Account User
which I accomplished with the following commands:
gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding $PROJECT_ID \ --member serviceAccount:$(gcloud projects describe $PROJECT_ID --format="value(projectNumber)")@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com \ --role roles/compute.instanceAdmin.v1 gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding $PROJECT_ID \ --member serviceAccount:$(gcloud projects describe $PROJECT_ID --format="value(projectNumber)")@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com \ --role roles/iam.serviceAccountUser
4) Creating Cloud Build Trigger
With all of the prerequisite configurations in place, it was then time to create the Cloud Build trigger:
export IMAGE_NAME=my-hugo-caddy-docker-image export INSTANCE_NAME=my-f1-micro-instance export ZONE=us-central1-a gcloud beta builds triggers create cloud-source-repositories \ --project=$PROJECT_ID \ --repo=my-cloud-source-repo-mirroring-a-github-repo \ --branch-pattern=master \ --build-config=cloudbuild.yaml \ --substitutions=_IMAGE_NAME=$IMAGE_NAME,_SSH_STRING=[email protected]$INSTANCE_NAME,_ZONE=$ZONE,_HOME=/home/$USER
--substitutions represent template variables that get used in the pipeline definition as will become apparent below.
Creating the Cloud Build Pipeline (cloudbuild.yaml)
At this point, Cloud Build was primed and ready to go… but I hadn’t told it what to do yet. The actual build pipeline is defined within a
cloudbuild.yaml file at the root of the repository.
Each step in this pipeline takes in a container image as its “name” and can also take optional arguments which are executed inside that container.
Below I have broken down this pipeline into its 6 steps:
1) Initialize and Update the Submodules
As mentioned above, one of the initial challenges using Cloud Build was it failing to get the files associated with the Hugo theme because they are located in a git submodule. The following uses the git cloud-builders image to initialize and update the git submodules, resulting in the theme files being available for future steps:
steps: - name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/git' entrypoint: 'bash' args: - -c - | git submodule init git submodule update
2) Build the Hugo Site
The whole reason for needing a build step is that only the content source files are version controlled (not the generated site files). This step runs the Hugo generator. I couldn’t find a publicly available container image which was compatible with Cloud Build, so I created my own (based on this example) and posted it to DockerHub: https://hub.docker.com/r/sidpalas/cloud-builder-hugo.
# build hugo site - name: 'sidpalas/cloud-builder-hugo:0.64.1'
3) Build + Push the Caddy Container Image
This step builds the website container image and pushes it to Google Container Registry. It uses the COMMIT_SHA (which is populated automatically by Cloud Build based on the triggering commit) to tag the image.
- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/docker' # Overriding entrypoint to allow for running two docker commands entrypoint: 'bash' args: - -c - | docker build -t gcr.io/$PROJECT_ID/$_IMAGE_NAME:$COMMIT_SHA . && docker push gcr.io/$PROJECT_ID/$_IMAGE_NAME:$COMMIT_SHA
4) Stop Running Containers & Start New Container
With the new container available in GCR, the pipeline stops any running containers and then starts the new container using a gcloud container image to execute a
gcloud ssh command on the VM.
- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/gcloud' args: - compute - ssh - $_SSH_STRING - --project=$PROJECT_ID - --zone=$_ZONE - -- - docker container stop $$(docker container ls -aq) && - docker container rm $$(docker container ls -aq) && - docker run -d --restart=unless-stopped -p 80:80 -p 443:443 -v $_HOME/.caddy:/root/.caddy gcr.io/$PROJECT_ID/$_IMAGE_NAME:$COMMIT_SHA
NOTE: Pushing Images
Normally, the build configuration would have an
images: section specifying which container images should be pushed to GCR. Because step #3 already tagged and pushed the container image, it is not necessary to include an images section:
images: - 'gcr.io/$PROJECT_ID/$_IMAGE_NAME:$COMMIT_SHA'
This process ended up being much more complex than I had initially hoped. The issues with Git submodules, and having to create my own Hugo builder image made it take much longer than I expected. That being said, it was quite satisfying when I got the configuration dialed in and the long stretch of red builds finally turned green.
While I am happy with the end result, I can’t help but think using Circle CI might have been a smoother process. Perhaps sometime down the to road I’ll attempt setting up an equivalent pipeline there and see how that goes!